Kepler KL400 versus ProLine PL23042

Specifications: KL400 vs. PL23042

KL400 PL23042
Sensor Type Back Illuminated CMOS Back Illuminated CCD
Active Pixels 2048 x 2048
Pixel Size 11 x 11 microns 15 x 15 microns
Effective Area 22.5 x 22.5 mm 30.7 x 30.7 mm
Sensor Diagonal 31.9 mm 43.4 mm
Full Well Capacity 90000 electrons 150000 electrons
Frame Rate (rolling) 24 fps HDR 5 seconds per frame
Read Noise (Rolling) 1.6 e- HDR (800 MHz) 13.5 e- (500 kHz)
Dynamic Range 86 dB HDR 81 dB (500 kHz)
Peak QE 95% (TVISB) 93% (Midband)
Cooling Air (Optional Liquid)
Dark Current 0.6 eps at -20C 0.2 eps at -30C
Interface USB 3.0 (Optional QSFP) USB 2.0
Data Bit Depth 16 bit
Optional Mount F-mount
Subarray Readout Yes
Electromechanical Shutter Optional 45mm Standard 65mm
External Trigger In/Out Yes
Software FLI Pilot FLIGrab
SDK USB 2 (Open Source) Kepler (Open Source)

ProLine and MicroLine cameras using the e2v CCD230-42 have been a standard for astronomy research since their release in 2012. The Kepler KL400 with back-illuminated CMOS provides an alternative with a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for exposures less than 7 minutes, as well as the potential for much higher frame rates.

The table below is a comparison of the ProLine PL23042 and the Kepler KL400 cameras, using a low flux value of 1 photon/pixel/second.

Exposure (sec) 400 SNR 23042 SNR
1 x 900 21.6 23.4
10 x 90 21.4 15.4
1 x 420 14.8 14.8
10 x 42 14.5 8.0

Summary: A Paradigm Shift

It is no surprise that the CCD’s best performance is with a single long exposure. At 15 minutes, the PL23042 has a somewhat higher SNR than the KL400. What may be surprising is how little the Kepler KL400’s signal-to-noise ratio changes when multiple images are stacked.

The benefit of taking multiple short exposures is the option to discard a bad exposure ruined by satellite trails, tracking errors, or bad seeing (etc.). Incredible low-noise images are now possible with a single long exposure or many stacked short exposures. The KL400’s low noise allows it to be used for a wide range of applications and requirements.

Quantum Efficiency: CCD230-42 versus GSense400 TVISB